Honey, Babies & Botulism… What’s Going On?

Honey, Babies & Botulism… What’s Going On?

Honey, Babies & Botulism… What’s Going On?

Disclaimer:
This information is not meant to downplay the dangers of botulism. It is meant to open thinking processes, stimulate common sense, and reduce fear around the topic.


Have you ever heard someone - young, old, medically trained, or your grandma - say,
“Don’t give babies under one honey because of the risk of botulism”?

Have you ever been the worried parent who realized your baby accidentally ate something with honey in it?
Or the one posting in a mom group, texting a friend, calling a nurse line, heart racing?

This warning has been passed around for decades, and while it didn’t come from nowhere, it also didn’t come with much context. So let’s slow this down, look at history, and then zoom out at the bigger picture.


Honey & Babies - A Historical Perspective

For most of human history, honey wasn’t a specialty food - it was a staple.

  • Honey was one of the earliest sweeteners humans had access to
  • It was used in foods, tonics, teas, and remedies
  • It was fed to children long before modern food processing or refrigeration existed

There were no labels. No age warnings. No universal feeding guidelines.

That doesn’t mean nothing ever went wrong - but it does mean the fear-based intensity around honey today is very modern.

The reason honey gets singled out is because it can contain botulinum spores - not the toxin itself, but the spores that could produce toxin if conditions are right.

The concern is that infants under one year old have an immature gut environment that might allow those spores to colonize.

Important word here: might.


What Actually Causes Infant Botulism?

Infant botulism isn’t caused by honey itself.
It’s caused when botulinum spores colonize the gut and begin producing toxin.

Here’s the part that often gets left out:

👉 Honey is not the most common source.

Environmental exposure is.

Botulinum spores exist naturally in:

  • Soil
  • Dust
  • Air
  • Agricultural environments

Which brings us to the bigger question…


Foods & Exposures With Equal or Higher Botulism Risk Than Honey

Many foods and exposures commonly given to babies under one have equal or greater documented association with botulinum spores - but they don’t carry the same fear-based messaging.

Higher-Risk or Comparable Sources Include:

  • Root vegetables (carrots, sweet potatoes, beets) grown in soil
  • Homemade baby foods prepared from fresh produce
  • Rice and rice cereal (especially when improperly stored)
  • Herbal teas or remedies made from dried plant material
  • Dust exposure (crawling babies, construction areas, farming communities)
  • Well water or untreated water sources

Yet parents aren’t told to panic if a baby licks the floor.
Or chews on a shoe.
Or eats mashed carrots.


Honey as a Short-Term Remedy in Babies Under One - Risk vs. Benefit

This is where the conversation gets uncomfortable, nuanced, and often shut down too quickly.

Historically and cross-culturally, honey has been used short-term as a medicinal food, not a daily sweetener - especially during illness. Coughs, throat irritation, poor appetite, weakness after sickness… honey shows up again and again in traditional care.

So let’s look at this through a risk vs. benefit lens instead of a blanket rule.

The Theoretical Risk

  • Honey can contain botulinum spores (not toxin)
  • Infant gut flora is still developing
  • Colonization is possible, not guaranteed
  • Documented cases are rare, even with widespread environmental exposure

The Potential Benefit (Short-Term, During Illness)

  • Honey has antimicrobial and antibacterial properties
  • It coats and soothes irritated throat tissue
  • It can reduce coughing frequency and severity
  • It provides quick, easily digestible energy during illness
  • It may help calm inflammation and support rest when appetite is low

This is not about spoon-feeding honey daily to infants.
It’s about intentional, short-term medicinal use when a child is already sick, depleted, coughing, or struggling.

Context Matters

Risk is not just about what is used - it’s about:

  • Dose (drops vs. spoonfuls)
  • Duration (short-term vs. daily)
  • Health of the child (term vs. premature, gut health, immune stress)
  • Environment (soil exposure, household dust, well water, etc.)

A baby crawling on the floor, mouthing toys, eating root vegetables, or exposed to dust is already encountering spores regularly.

Honey doesn’t exist in isolation.

Why This Conversation Is Rare

Modern guidance tends to favor:

  • Absolute rules
  • Zero-risk messaging
  • Liability protection

But biology doesn’t operate in absolutes - it operates in trade-offs.

For some families, the benefit of symptom relief, hydration support, and calming a sick baby may outweigh a very small theoretical risk - especially when used briefly, intentionally, and with awareness.


So Why Does Honey Get All the Fear?

Because it’s:

  • Easy to label
  • Easy to regulate
  • Easy to reduce to a single-sentence warning

Modern parenting culture thrives on clear villains, even when biology is more nuanced.

Honey became the “don’t do this” rule, while the rest of real-life exposure stayed quiet.


Context Over Panic

None of this means:

  • “Ignore medical advice”
  • “Feed honey freely to infants”
  • “Botulism isn’t serious”

It does mean:

  • Accidental exposure is not an emergency by default
  • Fear-based responses often outweigh actual risk
  • Real life is messier than checklists

If your baby accidentally consumed something with honey in it, panic does not improve outcomes. Awareness, observation, and grounded decision-making do.


A Gentler Way to Think About It

Instead of:

“Honey is dangerous”

A more accurate understanding is:

“Botulinum spores exist in our environment, and infant digestion develops with time.”

Risk exists on a spectrum, not as a switch that flips at exactly 12 months old.


What to Look For If You’re Concerned

In the rare event of infant botulism, symptoms develop gradually, not immediately. If a baby has had a possible exposure and symptoms appear, they typically include:

  • Noticeable constipation or sudden change in bowel habits
  • Poor or weaker sucking or feeding
  • Unusual lethargy or low energy
  • Weak or soft crying
  • Decreased head or neck control

Symptoms do not appear right away and are not caused by a single small exposure. If multiple symptoms develop or worsen over time, contacting a healthcare provider for evaluation is appropriate.

Most importantly, panic is not helpful. Observation, calm awareness, and trusting your instincts as a parent matter far more than fear-driven reactions.


Final Thought

Sometimes the goal isn’t to eliminate every possible risk -
it’s to understand it well enough that fear no longer drives the conversation.

And that’s a very different kind of safety.


Disclaimer

This content is intended for educational and informational purposes only and reflects historical use, biological context, and risk-based discussion. It is not medical advice and is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.

Every child, family, and health situation is different. Parents and caregivers are encouraged to use discernment, observe their child closely, and consult with a trusted healthcare professional when making decisions related to infant feeding or illness.

The goal of this discussion is not to replace medical guidance, but to support informed, thoughtful decision-making rooted in understanding rather than fear.

 

Back to blog

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.